There Might Only be One Jobst Heinrich

The Neubau file establishes the creation of Stätte Nr. 18 by a Schneider named Jobst Heinrich Krückeberg according to the administrative records. However, the absence of corresponding parish records for such an individual and the fact that Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg, who we know

suggests that Jobst Heinrich is incorrect in the documents. It should be Carl Friedrich Gottlieb.

Hans Heinrich Wilharm, no. 11 Evesen, was Carl Friedrich Gottlieb’s Brother-in-law

When Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg’s son, Carl Friedrich, was baptized on May 24, 1807, Hans Heinrich Wilharm was one of his baptismal sponsors. Hans Heinrich Wilharm was related by marriage to Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg. He was his brother-in-law, more specifically his half brother-in-law.

To understand this, we begin with the March 13, 1803, marriage of Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg of no. 10 Berenbusch to Philippine Eleonore Werkmeister of no. 11 Evesen, whose mother was Ilse Maria. Ilse Maria’s name appears as Anna Ilsabey Möller in her 1754 confirmation record. Ilsabey is a regional, phonetic compound form of Elisabeth (Ilsa/Ilse + bey/beÿ), and Ilse and Ilsa are shorten forms derived from its first element.

cfg krueckeberg werkmeister marriage

By examinng the birth records of her children, we find her complete given name was Anna Maria Elisabeth.

When Ilse Marie married Philippine Eleonore’s father, Heinrich Tönnes Werkmeister, on June 11, 1780, it was her second marraige. The marriage record lists her as Maria Ilse Maria née Möller, widow of Bleke. This previous marriage to Johann Bleke, no. 11 Evesen, ccurred on February 18, 1770. The births of their four children shows the family resided at no. 11 Evesen:

Children of Johann Heinrich Bleke and Anna Maria Elisabeth Möller
Child Link to Baptism Record Family Residence Father Mother

Johann Heinrich

7 Oct. 1770

no. 11 Evesen

Johann Heinrich Blecken

Anna Maria Elisabeth Möller

Anna Maria Phlippina

11 July 1773

no. 11 Evesen

Johann Heinrich Blecken

Anna Marie Elisabeth Möller

Anna Ilsa Margaretha

17 Dec. 1775

no. 11 Evesen

Johann Heinrich Bleken

Ilse Margarethe Elisabeth Möller

Sophia Ernestine

11 Sep. 1778

Evesen

Johann Heinrich Bleken

Anne Ilse Maria Möller

On October 10, 1779, Johann Heinrich Bleke age only 34 died of a "bösartige Fieber", a malignant fever. His widow, Anna Ilsabey Möller, married Heinrich Tönnis Werkmeiter the next year.

As mentioned above, Ilse Maria’s second marriage produced a daughter, Philippina Eleonore Werkmeister, who was baptized on May 4, 1783. Twenty years later she married Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg on March 13, 1803. From the marriage record we learn she had been living at no. 11 Evesen, and he at no. 10 Berenbusch.

Hans Heinrich Wilharm also married a daughter of Ilse Marie from her first marraige to Johann Heinrich Bleke. On May 8, 1796, he married her first daughter, Anne Marie Philippine Blecke of no. 11 Evesen, who was the half-sister of Philippine Eleonore.

sophie ernestine bleke wilharm tree

The day after the birth of their first child, on April 10, 1797, she died. And later that same year, on August 27, 1797, Hans Heinrich Wilharm married her younger sister, Sophie Ernestine Blecke, who had been living with her late sister and brother-in-law at no. 11 Evesen. She, too, was the half-sister of Philippine Eleonore nee Werkmeister Krückeberg, making Hans Heinrich Wilharm and Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg half brother-in-laws.

Otto Anmton Vogt, Hans Heinrich Wilharm’s second Brother-in-Law

Another brother-in-law of Hans Heich Wilharm was Otto Anton Vogt (1785-?) who, on May 10, 1812, married Anna Ilse Margarethe Blecken (1775-1846), the 2nd child of the lkate Johann Heinrich Blecken (1746-1779). Prior to their marriage, she also had lived at no. 11 in Evesen. He was 27 years old and she was 36. She had a grown daughter who had been born out of wedlock.

Otton Anton Vogt’s background will help decipher the mystery that surrounds Jobst Heinrich Krückeberg and no. 18 Berenbusch.

Another Critical Piece of Information

Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg’s wife, Philippine Eleonore Werkmeister, was, according to their March 12, 1803, marriage record, from no. 11 Evesen.

According to nla:146:doc1.adoc, we know that in September 1808 no. 11 Evesen was the home of the Wilharms. We know his complete name to be Hans Heinrich Wilharm because the baptism record of Carl Friedrich Gottlieb’s only son, Carl Friedrich, lists Hans Heinrich Wilharm of no. 11 Evesen as a baptismal sponsor.

Its Significance

Circumstantial evidence: Three independent facts now converge on Wilharm Nr. 11, Evesen:

  1. Carl Friedrich Gottlieb’s wife was from Nr. 11 Evesen (1803 marriage).

  2. Hans Heinrich Wilharm of Nr. 11 was sponsor at their son’s baptism (1807).

  3. The Neubau petitioner (1808) states he was Einlieger bei Wilharm Nr. 11. Together, this strongly suggests the Neubau petitioner lodged within the same household network as Carl Friedrich Gottlieb’s family.

Concrete next step

Find any contemporaneous record (c. 1803–1809) that names residents or lodgers at Wilharm Nr. 11, Evesen—e.g., Amt tax/levy lists, household or fire registers, poor-relief accounts, military substitution lists—and look specifically for Carl Friedrich (Gottlieb) Krückeberg listed as Einlieger/Schneider at that address.

Next-step leg-work (succinct):

  1. Target the address, not the person: review any Amt-level financial or obligation records (c. 1803–1809) that mention Wilharm Nr. 11, Evesen—tax/contribution rolls, Brandkasse (fire insurance), levies, receipts, or side papers.

  2. Scan Rentkammer spillover: check Anlagen, marginal notes, and receipts in nearby Rentkammer files that reference Wilharm Nr. 11 or Evesen households.

  3. Leverage the wife’s line: re-check Werkmeister family items (witness lists, confirmations, estates) for any post-1803 residence cues tying the couple to Nr. 11.

  4. Capture indirect proof: note any document that places a Krückeberg Schneider/Einlieger in the Wilharm Nr. 11 household network within that window—even without naming lodgers explicitly.

Summary

Although the Neubau file names the petitioner as Jobst Heinrich Krückeberg, exhaustive review of the Petzen parish registers shows no corresponding sacramental record for an Evesen-born couple of that name. At the same time, multiple independent records place Carl Friedrich Gottlieb Krückeberg and his wife in the Wilharm Nr. 11 Evesen household network between 1803 and 1808, exactly where the Neubau petitioner lodged. Given the procedural context of the Neubau and the later succession to Nr. 18, the balance of evidence favors identity with Carl Friedrich Gottlieb despite the administrative naming.